Change country and languageSelect your preferred country/language combination
FR Flag

Your location is set to France

Your settings are:
Selected currencyEUR / Selected country FranceSelected language Français

Barres, Gel ou Boisson Énergétique

6min de lecture

It's 9:00 PM the evening before a competition or a long-distance race, and you're now looking down at all the equipment scattered across your bed at home. A crucial question always arises—how can I fit everything in? Let's delve into the science behind what's best: Sports Drinks, Energy Bars, or Energy Gels? Is one of them the clear winner? Perhaps it's just a matter of practical differences.

Researchers have naturally explored this field and have answers to the question. In 2010, a research team was assembled with the task of examining how sports drinks, gels, and bars are absorbed and utilized as energy in the body, and whether there are differences in absorption rates and stomach issues between solid and liquid nourishment.

 

What distinguishes these three energy sources?

 

he quick answer is—WATER. Somewhat playfully, you can describe it as an energy gel being a sports drink mixed with very little water, while a bar is a gel that has been left in the sun for a few hours and dried. If we break down the products into their macronutrients, there's usually some form of carbohydrate source (oatmeal, glucose syrup, fructose, dextrose), possibly some amino acids/protein, and finally salts/minerals and water. In bars, you often find a bit of oil to provide the bar with its consistency. Enough to say, there are significant differences among various types of gels when it comes to osmolarity and content. But osmosis is primarily controlled by the liquid content.

The advantage of gels and bars is simply that they are concentrated energy sources, resulting in lower weight (you don't have to carry any water). The benefit of sports drinks is that you also intake water and salts, which you lose during exercise and competition. Therefore, sports drinks are the wisest choice from a performance standpoint, assuming you can conveniently carry them. But let's examine what researchers say when comparing these products to one another.

U Gel or U Bar?
If both of these energy sources are optimized in terms of composition, the difference in absorption and oxidation is very slight. The gel is slightly more viscous, and the bars are even denser in structure, which to some extent slows down stomach emptying, partly due to the content of gel fibers, such as guar gum in the gel, and the slightly increased amount of fibers and fat in the bars.

However, with more recent research, we now know that stomach emptying is not the bottleneck in the system, something that was believed until 10-15 years ago. Older research focused more on molecular weight and speed through the stomach to optimize these processes. Nowadays, we understand that factors like molecular weight are quite irrelevant; it may even be that higher molecular weight can have negative effects on us.

The true bottleneck occurs when energy is absorbed into the bloodstream in the intestines. Here, it's been demonstrated that the ratio should be 1:0.5 or 1:0.8 between glucose molecules and fructose molecules to deliver maximum energy while being gentle on the stomach. All of our products adhere to this carbohydrate ratio as we develop them based on research findings.

U Sport or U Gel?
In this case, researchers selected 8 well-trained male cyclists and triathletes with a VO2max of 61 ml/kg/min. Participants trained at least 3 times a week and had a weekly volume of at least 6 hours. They underwent 3 identical tests where they cycled for 3 hours on a test bike and consumed 1.8 grams of carbohydrates per minute (1:0.5 glucose/fructose solution) via sports drink or gel. They also performed a test where they only consumed water. The order of the tests was random, but they conducted one test per week. Fluid intake during the tests was also identical.

Researchers didn't detect any difference in absorption or energy utilization between sports drinks and gels, as long as fluid intake was identical. Whether you have water in your bottle and consume energy via gel or mix sports drinks directly in the bottle, it matters little. Practical aspects play a more significant role. For many runners, it's more convenient, for example, to use U Gel during the run and drink water at the stations than to carry the pre-mixed sports drink.

Athletes who only consumed water during cycling performed well too. They burned just as much energy during all attempts but utilized more fatty acids as fuel because they didn't intake carbohydrates. They perceived the effort as more challenging and had a higher heart rate, which isn't surprising. Cycling for 3 hours with only water is more demanding than cycling for 3 hours with energy, even at lower intensity.

 

Let's take a closer look at the various energy sources.

 

Bars
Our energy bars have a foundation of oatmeal and sugars to balance the carbohydrate ratio. In these bars, we find fruits/berries for flavoring; these are also glucose/fructose-based. Finally, we include some coconut oil/rapeseed oil to give the bar its consistency.

In these bars, the liquid content is lower than in gels and sports drinks, but they provide a bit more solid food and something to chew on, which can be appreciated when your stomach grumbles.

However, it's essential to consider that with more solid food, the risk of stomach issues increases when energy intake is high (due to more mass for the stomach/intestines to process). For lower-intensity and longer workouts, though, bars are very convenient and satisfying. ;)

Gel
Après les barres, nous avons nos U Gels (avec ou sans caféine) dans lesquels il y a plus d'eau par rapport au U Bar, mais moins d'eau que le mélange recommandé dans la boisson sportive.

L'avantage principal des gels est qu'ils sont légers, rapides et fournissent une énergie concentrée pour des performances optimales et un estomac calme. Ils sont parfaits pour les courses plus courtes où vous n'avez pas besoin de beaucoup de liquide ou où vous n'avez pas besoin d'emporter votre liquide avec vous. Le gel Umaras a également une bonne teneur en sel et en minéraux, remplaçant ce que vous perdez par la transpiration.
Boisson Énergétique
L'avantage de U Sports est que vous perdez également de l'eau et des sels minéraux pendant l'entraînement et les compétitions. Par conséquent, consommer une boisson énergétique est le choix le plus judicieux du point de vue de la performance, à condition d'avoir de la place pour le liquide. Vous pouvez également mélanger une boisson énergétique aussi concentrée qu'un gel.

En Résumé

En pratique, cela signifie que c'est à vous de choisir la forme d'énergie en fonction de vos besoins. Ce qui est important, c'est la composition des produits, et nous nous en occupons. Ensuite, il vous appartient d'utiliser l'énergie de la manière la plus pratique pour vous.

Personnellement, nous préférons U Sports comme source d'énergie lorsque l'intensité est élevée et que la performance est l'objectif principal. Cependant, nous intégrons U Gel pour la variété de saveurs et un peu de caféine.